The atheism in a post-religious

Tremblay, Francois - Atheism in a post-religious - Suite101 2004

"If a man to follow, today, the lessons learned from the Old Testament is a criminal. If we are in strict accordance with the teachings of the new, it would be crazy"

(Robert Ingersoll)

We are a world religion? Ask a fundamentalist militant Muslims to Christians, Jews, Orthodox and Hindu Nationalsozialismusisme. The Religion is far from being completed. Eighteenth-EEUWSE light seat, as the author himself often admits that atheism as a religion, is on the defensive.

First we need to clarify our terminology. Atheism is not the same as disturbances that are not the same as against the Theismus.

Atheism is a religion, a new faith. It is based on the belief Bearbeitungsfähig tamperproof (universal negative) that there is no God. Agnosticismnoch open: God Mai do not bestaanR or May. Overture There are arguments in both directions.

Fight against Theismus is a militantenti-clericalism. Anti-theistic (such as Tremblay and myself) that religion as an absolute evil that must be disposed of in a better world. This treasure of a book - it is amazing how the author 50 pages are in a hurry! - This is anti-Theismus.

Tremblay labels religion psychic fraud and terrorism, and describes in a convincing Weisente why he Epitheta. Indisoluble shows the relationship between the belief in the beyond of religion and immorality and punishment intolerana time with his ever-changing philosophical rules. Dogmatism leads to a loss of wealth of knowledge and experience of negative consequences for both the believers and their environment.

Religion, Tremblay notes with bitterness and disgust are not disguised, fraud people with false promises from the time derurs words are verwerflich it is normal that it promotes and lies. In ofvolgende motsden is a criminal organization.

In the chapter about the misleading arguments dediseño on the works of George Smith, Michael Martin, and Corey Washington. His treatment of the issue is still original and refreshing - complexity and order, not the planning, will be displayed.

The book is not without its faults arguments - but they do nothing more than de pleasure sparring spiritually fascinated with thising author. Uncheid not between religions and cults or sects. Theocracy also defined as the rule of religion (lexicamenteorrect c) if in the real world is the misuse and abuse of religion by government leaders.

I have to indicate the wealth of discoveries, theories, hypotheses and theories in the sciences and in formal logic. Consider this example: You can prove dassGott can not and is not exist ( "strong atheism"), Tremblay has since zeGod leads to a feeling or a conflict, or both. But precisely this theorem G6del: the systems of formal logic is not complete or consistent, but never both. It is a shame that they forgot to mention.

Finally, in my opinion, Tremblay, lose the overview. Like Freud, there is just a century of religion is a disease. You can not with rational arguments people whose procedure wase suspended, and why. Price enOnder beliefs and personal neelstellingen lost fans Délire.

Religious people have faith in God, because it unites and deep (and unhealthy) emotional needs - or not porquesu that is demonstrated. The fact that everyone - including atheists - Organization of irrational beliefs to a certain extent. Only the religion of a virulent strain and insidious irrationality.

The new battle between the union of the strijdkrachtenvan of primary and resurgtion Dark Age - read this book. It is a jewel, a guide for the true apocalypse, which to us.